These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641115)

  • 21. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
    Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cutting pattern of nickel-titanium files using two preparation techniques.
    Elliott LM; Curtis RV; Pitt Ford TR
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1998 Feb; 14(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9643172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Penetration of constricted canals with modified K files.
    Kobayashi C
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):391-3. PubMed ID: 9545950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
    Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 May; 33(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 11307444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
    Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.