162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641140)
1. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.
Beeson TJ; Hartwell GR; Thornton JD; Gunsolley JC
J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9487860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
Mohammadi Z
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement.
Usman N; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
J Endod; 2004 Feb; 30(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 14977309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.
Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Suda H
Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19703077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion.
Lambrianidis T; Tosounidou E; Tzoanopoulou M
J Endod; 2001 Nov; 27(11):696-8. PubMed ID: 11716084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
