These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641140)

  • 21. SEM analysis of smear layer removal after manual and automated handpiece root canal preparation.
    Sydney GB; Batista A; Estrela C; Pesce HF; de Melo LL
    Braz Dent J; 1996; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9206350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The predefined endodontic preparation: instrument and technique updates for the greater taper system.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2001 Jan; 20(1):56-60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 12524888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement.
    De-Deus G; Brandão MC; Barino B; Di Giorgi K; Fidel RA; Luna AS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 20727500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
    Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles.
    Yeter KY; Evcil MS; Ayranci LB; Ersoy I
    Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):795-9. PubMed ID: 23441844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Apical extrusion of debris by manual and mechanical instrumentation.
    Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
    Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17639194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vitro study of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic canal preparation.
    Brown DC; Moore BK; Brown CE; Newton CW
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):587-91. PubMed ID: 8596077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endodontics: Part 7. Preparing the root canal.
    Carrotte P
    Br Dent J; 2004 Nov; 197(10):603-13. PubMed ID: 15611742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
    Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
    J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current concepts for preparing the root canal system.
    Ruddle CJ
    Dent Today; 2001 Feb; 20(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 12524850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.