These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641145)

  • 1. The effect of instrument precurving on transportation in simulated curved canals.
    Svec TA; Wang MM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 9641145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precurving of nickel-titanium files affects transportation in simulated canals.
    Svec TA; Wang MM
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 9487861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks.
    Tharuni SL; Parameswaran A; Sukumaran VG
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):474-6. PubMed ID: 9198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
    Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the performance of four files with rounded tips during shaping of simulated root canals.
    Dummer PM; al-Omari MA; Bryant S
    J Endod; 1998 May; 24(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 9641115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
    Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.