269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641148)
21. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals.
Griffiths IT; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 11307210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec SC rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals.
Griffiths IT; Chassot AL; Nascimento MF; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 11307258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shaping ability of GTTM Rotary Files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; Raes H; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 12190900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of size and taper of artificial canals on the trajectory of NiTi rotary instruments in cyclic fatigue studies.
Plotino G; Grande NM; Mazza C; Petrovic R; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e60-6. PubMed ID: 19926504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shaping outcomes using two Ni-Ti rotary instruments in simulated canals.
Giovannone T; Migliau G; Bedini R; Ferrari M; Gallottini L
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):143-54. PubMed ID: 18427359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals.
Bishop K; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 1997 Jan; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9477791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shaping ability of RaCe rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals.
Rangel S; Cremonese R; Bryant S; Dummer P
J Endod; 2005 Jun; 31(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 15917688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
