These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641148)

  • 41. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Florek H
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jul; 31(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 9823115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1.
    Bryant ST; Thompson SA; al-Omari MA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jul; 31(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 9823117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Pruett JP; Clement DJ; Carnes DL
    J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 9220735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
    Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks.
    Tharuni SL; Parameswaran A; Sukumaran VG
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):474-6. PubMed ID: 9198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
    Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
    Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
    Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Shaping ability of the M4 handpiece and Safety Hedstrom files in simulated root canals.
    Lloyd A; Jaunberzins A; Dhopatkar A; Bryant S; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1997 Jan; 30(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9477790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.