These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641315)
1. Estimating cochlear filter response properties from distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase delay measurements in normal hearing human adults. Bowman DM; Eggermont JJ; Brown DK; Kimberley BP Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):14-26. PubMed ID: 9641315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of sound intensity on f1-sweep and f2-sweep distortion product otoacoustic emissions phase delay estimates in human adults. Bowman DM; Brown DK; Eggermont JJ; Kimberley BP J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1550-9. PubMed ID: 9069625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils. Mills DM J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults. Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Bowman DM; Brown DK; Kimberley BP Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 142(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 10748323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs. Moulin A J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs. Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure. Johnson TA; Baranowski LG Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears. Schoonhoven R; Prijs VF; Schneider S J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1503-12. PubMed ID: 11325122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. Moulin A J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications. Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 7608400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. Stover LJ; Neely ST; Gorga MP J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2669-78. PubMed ID: 10573884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. Abdala C J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1. Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations. Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study. Knight RD; Kemp DT J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring Optimal Stimulus Frequency Ratio for Measurement of the Quadratic f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Humans. Baiduc RR; Dhar S J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1794-1806. PubMed ID: 29946695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]