These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641318)

  • 1. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does static ear canal pressure influence pure tone pitch perception?
    Rowan D; Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 15141757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions.
    Murphy WJ; Tubis A; Talmadge CL; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3711-20. PubMed ID: 7790650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of external stimuli on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Frick LR; Matthies ML
    Ear Hear; 1988 Aug; 9(4):190-7. PubMed ID: 3169399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions measured using an open ear-canal recording technique.
    Boul A; Lineton B
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):112-21. PubMed ID: 20600736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A case study of monaural diplacusis.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 4066513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate.
    McFadden D; Pasanen EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3460-74. PubMed ID: 8046138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.
    Baiduc RR; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):300-14. PubMed ID: 24437770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspirin abolishes tinnitus caused by spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. A case study.
    Penner MJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Jul; 115(7):871-5. PubMed ID: 2736098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.
    Bian L; Watts KL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):887-98. PubMed ID: 18247892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7997834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in
    Cheatham MA; Zhou Y; Goodyear RJ; Dallos P; Richardson GP
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity discrimination, temporal integration and gap detection by normally-hearing subjects with weak and strong otoacoustic emissions.
    Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 10548371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Mishra R
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.