These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9641991)

  • 1. How mixed-species foraging flocks develop in response to benefits from observational learning.
    SasvÁri L; Hegyi Z
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jun; 55(6):1461-9. PubMed ID: 9641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What to copy: the key factor of observational learning in striped jack (Pseudocaranx dentex) juveniles.
    Takahashi K; Masuda R; Yamashita Y
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Mar; 17(2):495-501. PubMed ID: 24091646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence against observational spatial memory for cache locations of conspecifics in marsh tits
    Urhan AU; Emilsson E; Brodin A
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017; 71(2):34. PubMed ID: 28127116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further experimental analysis of the social learning and transmission of foraging information amongst Norway rats.
    Laland KN; Plotkin HC
    Behav Processes; 1992; 27(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24896467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic vocalization by female mice in the presence of a conspecific carrying food cues.
    Moles A; D'amato FR
    Anim Behav; 2000 Nov; 60(5):689-694. PubMed ID: 11082239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens.
    Nicol CJ; Pope SJ
    Anim Behav; 1999 Jan; 57(1):163-171. PubMed ID: 10053083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neighborhood effects in mixed-species flocks affect foraging efficiency of intermediate and little egrets.
    Huang CK; Lee YF; Kuo YM
    Zoology (Jena); 2021 Feb; 144():125874. PubMed ID: 33279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning of efficient behaviour in spatial exploration through observation of behaviour of conspecific in laboratory rats.
    Takano Y; Ukezono M; Nakashima SF; Takahashi N; Hironaka N
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Sep; 4(9):170121. PubMed ID: 28989731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience of a hierarchical relationship between a pair of mice specifically influences their affective empathy toward each other.
    Park J; Ha S; Shin HS; Jeong J
    Genes Brain Behav; 2022 Jun; 21(5):e12810. PubMed ID: 35451184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of social information from live demonstrators compared to video playback on blue tit foraging decisions.
    Hämäläinen L; Rowland HM; Mappes J; Thorogood R
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7998. PubMed ID: 31720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social exploitation of intermittently available foods and the social reinstatement of food preference.
    Galef BG; Whiskin EE
    Anim Behav; 2000 Nov; 60(5):611-615. PubMed ID: 11082231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food preference and copying behaviour in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata.
    Guillette LM; Morgan KV; Hall ZJ; Bailey IE; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():145-50. PubMed ID: 24797456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability of Laying Hens to Distinguish Between Companions According to Their Success in Gaining Access to Food.
    Wichman A
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():234. PubMed ID: 30327769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies.
    Lachlan RF; Crooks L; Laland KN
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jul; 56(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 9710476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keypeck conditioning with reinforcements in two different locations in thrush, tit and sparrow species.
    Sasvári L
    Behav Processes; 1985 Aug; 11(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 24896449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed species flocking of tits (Parus spp.): a field experiment.
    Székely T; Szép T; Juhász T
    Oecologia; 1989 Mar; 78(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28312178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecological plasticity by morphological design reduces costs of subordination: influence on species distribution.
    Moreno E; Barluenga M; Barbosa A
    Oecologia; 2001 Aug; 128(4):603-607. PubMed ID: 28547406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dominance and social information use in a lizard.
    Kar F; Whiting MJ; Noble DWA
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):805-812. PubMed ID: 28577256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of social learning on avoidance of aposematic prey in juvenile great tits (Parus major).
    Landová E; Hotová Svádová K; Fuchs R; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):855-866. PubMed ID: 28639012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social learning of food types in zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) is directed by demonstrator sex and feeding activity.
    Katz M; Lachlan RF
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12658531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.