These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9642024)

  • 1. Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets.
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Pearson T
    Brain Lang; 1998 Jun; 63(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 9642024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing: more on contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.
    Hellige JB; Cumberland N
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Mar; 45(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 11237364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interhemispheric transmission of information in manual and verbal reaction-time tasks.
    Tassinari G; Morelli M; Berlucchi G
    Hum Neurobiol; 1983; 2(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 6313556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of bilateral presentations on lateralized lexical decision.
    Fernandino L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Jun; 64(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 17257728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive schizotypy scores correlate with left visual field interference for negatively valenced emotional words: A lateralized emotional Stroop study.
    Van Strien JW; Van Kampen D
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Oct; 169(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19740551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inspecting asymmetric presentations of words differing in informational and morphemic structure.
    Batt V; Underwood G; Bryden MP
    Brain Lang; 1995 Jun; 49(3):202-23. PubMed ID: 7640963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual field x response hand interactions and level priming in the processing of laterally presented hierarchical stimuli.
    Wendt M; Vietze I; Kluwe RH
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The lateralized emotional stroop task: left visual field interference in women.
    Van Strien JW; Valstar LH
    Emotion; 2004 Dec; 4(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 15571438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination.
    Gilbert AL; Regier T; Kay P; Ivry RB
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 17628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.