These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A randomized, controlled trial of C0- Vs C2-guided therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine in stable heart transplant patients. Mathias HC; Ozalp F; Will MB; Borland W; Payne C; Kerr M; Lockhart J; Murday AJ J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2137-43. PubMed ID: 16364862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation]. Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. C2 is superior to C0 as predictor of renal toxicity and rejection risk profile in stable heart transplant recipients. Caforio AL; Tona F; Piaserico S; Gambino A; Feltrin G; Fortina AB; Angelini A; Alaibac M; Bontorin M; Calzolari D; Peserico A; Thiene G; Iliceto S; Gerosa G Transpl Int; 2005 Jan; 18(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 15612993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and clinical outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients. Akhlaghi F; Gonzalez L; Trull AK J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 16364860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients. White M; Pelletier GB; Tan A; Jesina C; Carrier M J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Aug; 16(8):787-94. PubMed ID: 9286770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclosporine profiling with C2 and C0 monitoring improves outcomes after heart transplantation. Barnard JB; Thekkudan J; Richardson S; Bittar MN; Martyszczuck R; Hasan J; Khasati N; Keevil B; Yonan N J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 May; 25(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 16678036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation. Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients. Takatsuki M; Chen CL; Chen YS; Wang CC; Lin CC; Yang CH; Yong CC; Liu YW Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 18(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 15516246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters to facilitate conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in heart transplant recipients. Davies RA; Veinot JP; Williams K; Haddad H; Baker A; Donaldson J; Pugliese C; Struthers C; Masters RG; Hendry PJ; Mesana T Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3334-9. PubMed ID: 18089382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients? Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-years experience with Neoral C2 monitoring adjusted to a target range of 500-600 ng/ml in long-term renal transplant recipients receiving dual immunosuppressive therapy. Carstens J Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 18432535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of C0 and C2 levels with cyclosporine side effects in kidney transplantation. Rodrigo E; Ruiz JC; Angeles de Cos M; Ruiz J; Gago M; Piñera C; Sánchez B; González-Cotorruelo J; Gómez-Alamillo C; Arias M Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2328-31. PubMed ID: 19715910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases. Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study. Iversen M; Nilsson F; Sipponen J; Eiskjaer H; Mared L; Bergan S; Nyström U; Fagertun HE; Solbu D; Simonsen S J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Sep; 28(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 19716045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and side-effects of cyclosporine dose monitoring with levels 6 h after the morning dose in heart transplant patients. Cantarovich M; Besner JG; Fitchett DH; Latter DA Clin Transplant; 1997 Oct; 11(5 Pt 1):399-405. PubMed ID: 9361930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neoral dose adjustment after conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in stable renal transplant recipients: a prospective single center study. Sandrini S; Bossini N; Setti G; Mazzucchelli C; Maiorca P; Cancarini G J Nephrol; 2004; 17(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 15293530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]