BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9643055)

  • 1. Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?
    Deacon D; Nousak JM; Pilotti M; Ritter W; Yang CM
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 9643055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature versus gestalt representation of stimuli in the mismatch negativity system of 7- to 9-year-old children.
    Molholm S; Gomes H; Lobosco J; Deacon D; Ritter W
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 15102123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: a mismatch negativity study.
    Deouell LY; Bentin S
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov; 35(6):745-54. PubMed ID: 9844436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results.
    Opitz B; Rinne T; Mecklinger A; von Cramon DY; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 11771985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change.
    He C; Hotson L; Trainor LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):218-29. PubMed ID: 18722392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds.
    Müller D; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17056173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory sensory memory and the cholinergic system: implications for Alzheimer's disease.
    Pekkonen E; Hirvonen J; Jääskeläinen IP; Kaakkola S; Huttunen J
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 11467911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Kujala T; Aho E; Lepistö T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17257732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
    Schröger E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preperceptual human number sense for sequential sounds, as revealed by mismatch negativity brain response?
    Ruusuvirta T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Dec; 17(12):2777-9. PubMed ID: 17317679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators.
    Deouell LY; Bentin S; Giard MH
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 9643050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Vuust P; Brattico E; Seppänen M; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1432-43. PubMed ID: 22414595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the failure to detect stimulus deviance during sleep due to a rapid fading of sensory memory or a degradation of stimulus encoding?
    Sabri M; Campbell KB
    J Sleep Res; 2005 Jun; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15910509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deviance-elicited changes in event-related potentials are attenuated by ketamine in mice.
    Ehrlichman RS; Maxwell CR; Majumdar S; Siegel SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1403-14. PubMed ID: 18303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual cues release the temporal coherence of auditory objects in auditory scene analysis.
    Rahne T; Böckmann-Barthel M
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():125-34. PubMed ID: 19747455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theta EEG oscillatory activity and auditory change detection.
    Fuentemilla L; Marco-Pallarés J; Münte TF; Grau C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():93-101. PubMed ID: 18076870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potential correlates of phasic and tonic measures of the orienting reflex.
    Rushby JA; Barry RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Jul; 75(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 17462811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.