These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9643182)

  • 1. Class III cavity preparation in primary anterior teeth: in vitro retention comparison of conventional and modified forms.
    Piyapinyo S; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 9643182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
    Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
    Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding.
    Summitt JB; Chan DC; Dutton FB
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin restorations in vitro.
    Lee BB; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9643183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simplified primary incisor proximal restoration.
    Croll TP; Berg J
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 12627705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design.
    Summitt JB; Della Bona A; Burgess JO
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 8058898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives.
    Abdalla AI; El Eraki M; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 18269127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of a 3-step tooth disinfection procedure on dentin bond strength.
    Pappas M; Burns DR; Moon PC; Coffey JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 15942615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.