134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9643185)
1. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
Ludlow J; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films.
Tamburus JR; Lavrador MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9442609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
Forner Navarro L; Llena Puy MC; García Godoy F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dosage of a dental imaging system.
Soh G; Loh FC; Chong YH
Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 8511278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film.
Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 7614190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
