These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9644026)
1. [In response to correspondence from 27.12.1997, the editors are informed that the article in question was based on collected material from the Gynecologic Clinic II in the years 1990-1991]. Tomala J Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):101-2. PubMed ID: 9644026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [In this situation, my opinion concerning the identification of an article which I co-authored as plagiarism is that it is wrong and groundless]. Tomala J Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):102-3. PubMed ID: 9644027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A few words concerning the editorial note about the confirmation of plagiarism with regard to eight published articles by Dr. Andrzej Jendryczko]. Wroński M Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(5-6):306-9. PubMed ID: 9867694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [My explanation concerning the situation regarding articles identified as plagiarism]. Jendryczko A Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9644028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [In certain publications, the main author, A. Jendryczko is suspected of plagiarism]. Drózdz M Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):100. PubMed ID: 9644025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Publication of a review article in "Ginekologia Polska" identified as a plagiarism from the "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology]. Poreba R Ginekol Pol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):561. PubMed ID: 9867475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Another plagiarised paper in Preglad Lekarski. Władysław Sułowicz Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(11):738. PubMed ID: 10970211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Plagiarism is dishonest and can easily be exposed]. Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Sep; 167(37):3479. PubMed ID: 16159453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues. Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What do duplicate publications; self-plagiarism and the monotony of endless descriptive studies signify: publication pressures or simply a collective lack of imagination? O'Connor SJ Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 20525059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Request for retraction of an article from MEDLINE]. Bazowska G Ginekol Pol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):672. PubMed ID: 10026025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A perspective on the handling of duplicate and redundant publications. Tipton CM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1425-6. PubMed ID: 7869872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Special report: taking on the cheats. Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Misconduct in biomedical research]. de Jong JW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Misconduct and fraud in science]. Draml W Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1007-8. PubMed ID: 10677886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical misconduct in publishing: the editors' perspective. Sarr MG; Warshaw AL World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1374-6. PubMed ID: 16773251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]