These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9644284)

  • 1. Foreperiod length, but not memory, affects human reaction time in a precued, delayed response.
    Mohagheghi AA; Anson JG; Hyland BI; Parr-Brownlie L; Wickens JR
    Motor Control; 1998 Apr; 2(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 9644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does having to remember the position of a target improve reaction time?
    Parr-Brownlie L; Wickens J; Anson JG; Hyland B
    Motor Control; 1998 Apr; 2(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9644285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Kurniawan A; Khan ME; Khan MC; Smith KL; Scharoun Benson S; Carlsen AN; Lawrence GP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; 77(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 36847427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foreperiod and range effects on time interval categorization.
    Laflamme V; Zakay D; Gamache PL; Grondin S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1507-14. PubMed ID: 26022698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of foreperiod on response latency of different movement patterns.
    Yuanhui M; Kasai T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1160-2. PubMed ID: 8170765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time.
    Correa A; Nobre AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 18632896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards.
    Leth-Steensen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19041084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independence of reaction time and response force control during isometric leg extension.
    Fukushi T; Ohtsuki T
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Apr; 22(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 15161111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1089-97. PubMed ID: 9360481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foreperiod duration, range, and ordering effects on acoustic LRT in normal speakers.
    Watson BC
    J Voice; 1994 Sep; 8(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 7987427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameter precuing and motor preparation.
    Anson JG; Hyland BI; Kötter R; Wickens JR
    Motor Control; 2000 Apr; 4(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 11500576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dual nature of time preparation: neural activation and suppression revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Davranche K; Tandonnet C; Burle B; Meynier C; Vidal F; Hasbroucq T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3766-74. PubMed ID: 17610596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of elbow position on the range of supination and pronation of the forearm.
    Shaaban H; Pereira C; Williams R; Lees VC
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Feb; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18332013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?
    Jurczyk V; Mittelstädt V; Fröber K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1066-1083. PubMed ID: 32067103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during the foreperiod of a forewarned reaction time task.
    Böcker KB; Forget R; Brunia CH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 7681751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.
    Jordan K; Hyland BI; Wickens JR; Anson JG
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 16032407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparatory inhibition of cortico-spinal excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.
    Hasbroucq T; Kaneko H; Akamatsu M; Possamaï CA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1997 Mar; 5(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 9088555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.