These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9644330)

  • 1. Improving the U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory database for environmental health research.
    Neumann CM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9644330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory.
    Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):49-56. PubMed ID: 20122796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting air emissions from animal production activities in the United States.
    Centner TJ; Patel PG
    Environ Int; 2010 Apr; 36(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 20056277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA.
    Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2235-40. PubMed ID: 21561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air toxics in the U.S.: magnitude of the problem and strategy for control.
    Berry DK
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):1-12. PubMed ID: 2274973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental and risk screening for prioritizing pollution prevention opportunities in the U.S. printed wiring board manufacturing industry.
    Lam CW; Lim SR; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):315-22. PubMed ID: 21398034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Globally sustainable manganese metal production and use.
    Hagelstein K
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Sep; 90(12):3736-40. PubMed ID: 19467569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Databases applicable to quantitative hazard/risk assessment--towards a predictive systems toxicology.
    Waters M; Jackson M
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 18675838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keeping tabs on toxics.
    Young JE
    World Watch; 1992; 5(3):9, 33. PubMed ID: 12317431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why IRIS is outdated: an additional perspective.
    Graham J
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1411-2. PubMed ID: 17184385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of health information in air pollution health research: past successes and emerging needs.
    Thurston GD; Bekkedal MY; Roberts EM; Ito K; Pope CA; Glenn BS; Ozkaynak H; Utell MJ
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 18781194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IRIS from the inside.
    Mills A
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1409-10; discussion 1413. PubMed ID: 17184384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EPCRA: a retrospective on the environmental Right-to-Know Act.
    Purifoy DM
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2013; 13(2):375-417. PubMed ID: 24340825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pushing the environmental regulatory focus a step back: controlling the introduction of new chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Hanan A
    Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(4):395-421. PubMed ID: 1306613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing the National Academy's Vision and Strategy for Toxicity Testing: opportunities and challenges under the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Locke PA; Bruce Myers D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):376-84. PubMed ID: 20574909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals.
    Egeghy PP; Judson R; Gangwal S; Mosher S; Smith D; Vail J; Cohen Hubal EA
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():159-66. PubMed ID: 22104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Give the public and workers the full right to know and participate.
    Orum P; Heminway D
    New Solut; 2007; 17(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 17959563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human health and the environment can't wait for reform: current opportunities for the federal government and states to address chemical risks under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Trevisan L
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):385-430. PubMed ID: 25335197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.