These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9645400)

  • 1. Design and analysis issues in split mouth clinical trials.
    Hujoel PP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 26(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 9645400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on a commentary: statistical evaluation of split mouth caries trials.
    Vaeth M; Poulsen S
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 26(2):80-3; discussion 84. PubMed ID: 9645399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are all clinical caries prevention studies biased?
    Alanen P
    J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):796-7. PubMed ID: 10765950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pros and cons of noninferiority trials.
    Pocock SJ
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 17(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 12914552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials".
    Röhmel J; Hauschke D
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):174-5; author reply 176. PubMed ID: 16544822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of clinical trials of agents and procedures to prevent caries and periodontal disease: choosing products and recommending procedures.
    Addy M
    Int Dent J; 1995 Jun; 45(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 7558357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals rather than P values.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):293-4. PubMed ID: 23374938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome measures in split mouth caries trials and their statistical evaluation.
    Riordan PJ; FitzGerald PE
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Jun; 22(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 8070248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation of treatment effects in periodontal research: a note on the number needed to treat.
    Stoner JA; Payne JB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):435-7. PubMed ID: 18538066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End to crossover designs for studies on the effect of sugar substitutes?
    Larmas M
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(2):169; author reply 170. PubMed ID: 20453506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiplicity 3: repeated measures.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):747-8. PubMed ID: 23631978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled clinical trials and practice-based research in dentistry.
    Mjör IA
    J Dent Res; 2008 Jul; 87(7):605. PubMed ID: 18573977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinician-trialist rounds: 5. Cointervention bias--how to diagnose it in their trial and prevent it in yours.
    Sackett DL
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):440-2. PubMed ID: 21835863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample calculation for split-mouth designs.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):818-9. PubMed ID: 22640684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials.
    Gunsolley JC; Elswick RK; Davenport JM
    J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 9623894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to Bayesian modelling in dental research.
    Gilthorpe MS; Maddick IH; Petrie A
    Community Dent Health; 2000 Dec; 17(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 11191195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixed noninferiority margin and statistical tests in active controlled trials.
    Tsou HH; Hsiao CF; Chow SC; Yue L; Xu Y; Lee S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):339-57. PubMed ID: 17365228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Avoiding ambiguity with the Type I error rate in noninferiority trials.
    Kang SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 26252624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.