These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9645669)

  • 1. Model for estimating population impacts averted through the remediation of contaminated soil.
    Wolbarst AB; Mauro J; Anigstein R; Beres D; Doehnert M; Hull HB; Marschke S
    Health Phys; 1998 Jul; 75(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 9645669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical basis for EPA's proposed regulation on the cleanup of sites contaminated with radioactivity.
    Wolbarst AB; Mauro J; Anigstein R; Back D; Bartlett JW; Beres D; Chan D; Clark ME; Doehnert M; Durman E; Hay S; Hull HB; Lailas N; MacKinney J; Ralston L; Tsirigotis PL
    Health Phys; 1996 Nov; 71(5):644-60. PubMed ID: 8887509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Cancer Risk Associated with Residential Exposure to Soil Containing Radioactive Coal Combustion Residuals.
    Towle KM; Jacobs NFB; Keenan JJ; Monnot AD
    Risk Anal; 2018 Jun; 38(6):1107-1115. PubMed ID: 29098707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
    Hoffman DE
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization and solubility measurements of uranium-contaminated soils to support risk assessment.
    Elless MP; Armstrong AQ; Lee SY
    Health Phys; 1997 May; 72(5):716-26. PubMed ID: 9106713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rural areas affected by the Chernobyl accident: radiation exposure and remediation strategies.
    Jacob P; Fesenko S; Bogdevitch I; Kashparov V; Sanzharova N; Grebenshikova N; Isamov N; Lazarev N; Panov A; Ulanovsky A; Zhuchenko Y; Zhurba M
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 19811802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A field test of electret ion chambers for environmental remediation verification.
    Paulus LR; Walker DW; Thompson KC
    Health Phys; 2003 Sep; 85(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 12938728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uranium partition coefficients (Kd) in forest surface soil reveal long equilibrium times and vary by site and soil size fraction.
    Whicker JJ; Pinder JE; Ibrahim SA; Stone JM; Breshears DD; Baker KN
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 17563491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine dose estimates for the removal of soil from a basin to the burial ground at the Savannah River Site.
    Simpkins AA
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S53-6. PubMed ID: 14744072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new tool for analysis of cleanup criteria decisions.
    Klemic GA; Bailey P; Elcock D
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2 Suppl):S25-30. PubMed ID: 12865746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved environmental pathway model for assessing high-level waste repository risks.
    Malbrain CM; Lester RK
    Health Phys; 1987 Nov; 53(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 3667272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contaminated sites from the past: experience of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
    Boyd MA
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Jun; 45(1 Suppl):84-90. PubMed ID: 27012843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating doses from Aboriginal bush foods post-remediation of a uranium mine.
    Doering C; Bollhöfer A; Medley P
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Jun; 172():74-80. PubMed ID: 28324688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the radiological impacts of a zircon sand processing plant.
    Righi S; Andretta M; Bruzzi L
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 82(2):237-50. PubMed ID: 15878420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of radon levels in soil and groundwater in the North Maladeta Fault area (Central Pyrenees) and their effects on indoor radon concentration in a thermal spa.
    Moreno V; Bach J; Zarroca M; Font L; Roqué C; Linares R
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Sep; 189():1-13. PubMed ID: 29544141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radon in soil gas--investigation and data standardisation at radon reference sites, Czech Republic.
    Matolín M; Koudelová P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18417491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the adequacy of maximum contaminant levels as health-protective cleanup goals: an analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques.
    Finley BL; Scott P; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 8128005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Particle size separation via soil washing to obtain volume reduction.
    Anderson R; Rasor E; Van Ryn F
    J Hazard Mater; 1999 Apr; 66(1-2):89-98. PubMed ID: 10379032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues concerning EPA's cost/benefit analyses of radiological cleanup criteria.
    Van Verst SP; Wells DP; Garcia NB
    Health Phys; 1997 Sep; 73(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 9287099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.