These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9646356)

  • 1. [Comment on the contributions regarding quality assurance in mammography].
    Mathias K; Neitzel U
    Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):446-7; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 9646356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Inaccuracies in mammography?. Interview by Petra Eiden].
    Müller-Schimpfle M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 1999 Sep; 141(38):16. PubMed ID: 10904609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comment on the contribution by J. Zaers et al. Quality assurance in roentgen mammography].
    Schöfer H
    Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):444-5; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 9646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breast cancer screening. In search of more quality].
    Wegner A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jun; 143(23):12. PubMed ID: 11460411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare program; Medicare coverage of screening mammography--HCFA. Interim final rule with comment.
    Fed Regist; 1990 Dec; 55(251):53510-25. PubMed ID: 10108588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [What kind of information do German health information pamphlets provide on mammography screening?].
    Kurzenhäuser S
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 12669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems].
    Stines J
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer--screening data for assessing quality of services--New York, 2000-2003.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jun; 53(21):455-7. PubMed ID: 15175570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
    McCue P
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.
    Inman M
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10181470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program.
    Rodger A; Kavanagh AM
    Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Organized breast cancer screening: experience at Bouches-du-Rhône].
    Seradour B
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1665-7. PubMed ID: 10188312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment.
    Hébert-Croteau N; Roberge D; Brisson J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Oct; 105(2):117-32. PubMed ID: 17186361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.