BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9646764)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of antegrade and retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fracture.
    Lin J; Inoue N; Valdevit A; Hang YS; Hou SM; Chao EY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jun; (351):203-13. PubMed ID: 9646764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture.
    Cheng HR; Lin J
    J Trauma; 2008 Jul; 65(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18580523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Retrograde Tibial Nail: presentation and biomechanical evaluation of a new concept in the treatment of distal tibia fractures.
    Kuhn S; Appelmann P; Pairon P; Mehler D; Rommens PM
    Injury; 2014 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():S81-6. PubMed ID: 24225228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures].
    Li WY; Zhang BS; Zhang L; Zheng SH; Wang Sm
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Mar; 22(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19366103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical analysis of four humeral fracture fixation systems.
    Zimmerman MC; Waite AM; Deehan M; Tovey J; Oppenheim W
    J Orthop Trauma; 1994; 8(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 8027893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and clinical effects of adding interfragmentary wiring to locked nailing for humeral nonunions.
    Hou SM; Lin J
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2004 Nov; 103(11):836-43. PubMed ID: 15549151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of bending and torsional properties in retrograde intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures.
    Blum J; Machemer H; Baumgart F; Schlegel U; Wahl D; Rommens PM
    J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 10406701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of the results of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade locked intramedullary nailing and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing].
    Liu XH; Sun L; Jiang XY; Wang MY; Zhang LD
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 87(13):902-5. PubMed ID: 17650402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of different internal fixation methods for humerus shaft fractures with medial butterfly fragment.
    Türken MA; Akdemir M; Uzun B; Ozkan M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2013; 47(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 23748616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic considerations of locked humeral nailing.
    Lin J; Hou SM; Inoue N; Chao EY; Hang YS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Nov; (368):247-54. PubMed ID: 10613175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Antegrade and retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures].
    Hessmann MH; Mittlmeier T
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2021 Apr; 33(2):139-159. PubMed ID: 33825914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Biomechanics of interlocked nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of 2 nail systems and the effect of interfragmentary compression with the unreamed humeral nail].
    Blum J; Machemer H; Högner M; Baumgart F; Schlegel U; Wahl D; Rommens PM
    Unfallchirurg; 2000 Mar; 103(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 10800380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mismatch analysis of humeral nailing: antegrade versus retrograde insertion.
    Mahaisavariya B; Jiamwatthanachai P; Aroonjarattham P; Aroonjarattham K; Wongcumchang M; Sitthiseripratip K
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Sep; 16(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 21792627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixation stability of comminuted humeral shaft fractures: locked intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation.
    Chen AL; Joseph TN; Wolinksy PR; Tejwani NC; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Koval KJ
    J Trauma; 2002 Oct; 53(4):733-7. PubMed ID: 12394875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Humeral nailing revisited.
    Rommens PM; Kuechle R; Bord T; Lewens T; Engelmann R; Blum J
    Injury; 2008 Dec; 39(12):1319-28. PubMed ID: 18417134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An innovative technique of rear entry creation for retrograde humeral nailing: how to avoid iatrogenic comminution.
    Biber R; Zirngibl B; Bail HJ; Stedtfeld HW
    Injury; 2013 Apr; 44(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 23347764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bending and torsional stiffness in cadaver humeri fixed with a self-locking expandable or interlocking nail system: a mechanical study.
    Blum J; Karagül G; Sternstein W; Rommens PM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Sep; 19(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 16118561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of the T2 humeral nailing system with special focus on compression interlocking.
    Mückley T; Diefenbeck M; Sorkin AT; Beimel C; Goebel M; Bühren V
    Injury; 2008 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 18164298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of a new medullary humeral nail: antegrade versus retrograde insertion.
    Blum J; Janzing H; Gahr R; Langendorff HS; Rommens PM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 11433139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of locked plate osteosynthesis, reamed and unreamed nailing in conventional interlocking technique, and unreamed angle stable nailing in distal tibia fractures.
    Hoegel FW; Hoffmann S; Weninger P; Bühren V; Augat P
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Oct; 73(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22710777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.