These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9647958)
1. Axial penile rigidity: determinants and relation to hemodynamic parameters. Goldstein I; Udelson D Int J Impot Res; 1998 May; 10 Suppl 2():S28-33; discussion S49-51. PubMed ID: 9647958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normal hemodynamic parameters do not always predict the presence of a rigid erection: a quantitative assessment of functional erectile impairment. Hatzichristou DG; Hatzimouratidis K; Tzortzis V; Apostolidis A; Bekos A; Ioannidis E Int J Impot Res; 2003 Apr; 15(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 12789388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced diagnostics in erectile dysfunction: beyond the concept of hemodynamics. Pescatori ES; Drei B; Silingardi V J Endocrinol Invest; 2003; 26(3 Suppl):125-6. PubMed ID: 12834038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients. Udelson D; Park K; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Salimpour P; Krane RJ; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1999 Dec; 11(6):327-37; discusion 337-9. PubMed ID: 10637463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part III--Clinical considerations of penile hemodynamic and rigidity erectile responses. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane RJ; Saenz de Tejada I; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Jun; 10(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9647944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital inflection rigidometry in the study of erectile dysfunction. A new technique]. Rosselló Barbará M Arch Esp Urol; 1996 Apr; 49(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 8702341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part I--Clinical implications of penile tissue mechanical properties. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane J; Saenz de Tejada IS; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Mar; 10(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 9542686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are normal hemodynamic responses invariably associated with normal penile rigidity and potency? Erdoğru T; Savaş M; Yilmaz N; Baykara M Int J Impot Res; 2001 Feb; 13(1):10-3; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 11313832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part II--Clinical implications of penile buckling. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane RJ; Saenz de Tejada I; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Mar; 10(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 9542687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The engineering analysis of bioheat equation and penile hemodynamic relationships in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction: part I-theoretical study and mathematical modeling. Ng WK; Ng EY; Chia SJ Int J Impot Res; 2008; 20(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 18075507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systemic and cavernosal plasma levels of endothelin (1-21) during different penile conditions in healthy males and patients with erectile dysfunction. Becker AJ; Uckert S; Stief CG; Truss MC; Hartmann U; Jonas U World J Urol; 2001 Nov; 19(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 11760787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of axial penile rigidity in objective evaluation of erection quality in patients with erectile dysfunction--comparison with radial rigidity. Mizuno I; Komiya A; Watanabe A; Fuse H Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 20215825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of RigiScan and sleep laboratory nocturnal penile tumescence in the diagnosis of organic impotence. Licht MR; Lewis RW; Wollan PC; Harris CD J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1740-3. PubMed ID: 7563336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction. Broderick GA Int J Impot Res; 1998 May; 10 Suppl 2():S64-73; discussion S77-9. PubMed ID: 9647964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systemic and cavernous plasma levels of endothelin (1-21) during different penile conditions in healthy males and patients with erectile dysfunction. Becker AJ; Uckert S; Stief CG; Truss MC; Hartmann U; Jonas U World J Urol; 2001 Aug; 19(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 11550788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dimensions, volume and rigidity of the penis. Fundamental elements in the study of the erection and its dysfunctions]. Virag R; Bouilly P; Virag H Ann Urol (Paris); 1986; 20(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 3740801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting penile size during erection. Chen J; Gefen A; Greenstein A; Matzkin H; Elad D Int J Impot Res; 2000 Dec; 12(6):328-33. PubMed ID: 11416836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Maximum increase of penile circumference as a parameter for evaluation of penile erectile capacity]. Adachi H; Satoh Y; Horita H; Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Sep; 88(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 9364844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]