BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9648087)

  • 1. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
    Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
    Kidney Int; 1998 Jul; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 9648087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conductivity: on-line monitoring of dialysis adequacy.
    Del Vecchio L; Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Barbisoni F; Locatelli F
    Int J Artif Organs; 1998 Sep; 21(9):521-5. PubMed ID: 9828057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.
    Maduell F; Vera M; Arias M; Serra N; Blasco M; Bergadá E; Fontsere N; Cases A; Campistol JM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18455852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling.
    Manzoni C; Di Filippo S; Corti M; Locatelli F
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 8918717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ionic dialysance to control the dose of dialysis. One year experience].
    Teruel JL; Fernández Lucas M; Arambarri M; Merino JL; Echarri R; Alarcón C; Marcén R; Rivera M; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2003; 23(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 14658171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Estimate of the dialysis dose using ionic dialysance].
    Teruel JL; Fernández Lucas M; Marcén R; Rodríguez JR; Rivera M; Liaño F; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2001; 21(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11344966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
    Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
    Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the dose of dialysis with integrated modules in the same monitor].
    Torregrosa E; Hernández-Jaras J; García-Pérez H; Pons-Prades R; Calvo-Gordo C; Ríus-Peris A; Sánchez-Canel JJ; Pin-Godos M
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 16808263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring.
    Wuepper A; Tattersall J; Kraemer M; Wilkie M; Edwards L
    Kidney Int; 2003 Dec; 64(6):2262-71. PubMed ID: 14633151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?
    Ridel C; Osman D; Mercadal L; Anguel N; Petitclerc T; Richard C; Vinsonneau C
    Intensive Care Med; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 17235509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance.
    Uhlin F; Fridolin I; Magnusson M; Lindberg LG
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2225-31. PubMed ID: 16611681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.
    Lindley EJ; Chamney PW; Wuepper A; Ingles H; Tattersall JE; Will EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Jan; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 18697799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment.
    McIntyre CW; Lambie SH; Taal MW; Fluck RJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2003 Mar; 18(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 12584279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal.
    Racki S; Zaputović L; Maleta I; Grzetić M; Mavrić Z; Devcić B; Vujicić B
    Ren Fail; 2005; 27(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16153000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disease severity adversely affects delivery of dialysis in acute renal failure.
    Schiffl H
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2007; 107(4):c163-9. PubMed ID: 17975323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of gender and body mass on hemodialysis dose].
    Kovacić V; Sain M; Dzanko D
    Acta Med Croatica; 2003; 57(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12876860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of hemodialysis dose: what Kt/V 
to choose?
    Aatif T; Hassani K; Alayoud A; Zajjari Y; Maoujoud O; Benyahia M; Oualim Z
    Int J Artif Organs; 2014 Jan; 37(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 24634332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ionic dialysance and the assessment of Kt/V: the influence of different estimates of V on method agreement.
    Moret K; Beerenhout CH; van den Wall Bake AW; Gerlag PG; van der Sande FM; Leunissen KM; Kooman JP
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Aug; 22(8):2276-82. PubMed ID: 17550929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ionic dialysance: principle and review of its clinical relevance for quantification of hemodialysis efficiency.
    Mercadal L; Ridel C; Petitclerc T
    Hemodial Int; 2005 Apr; 9(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16191058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].
    Petitclerc T; Coevoet B
    Nephrologie; 2001; 22(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 11572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.