These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9648469)

  • 21. Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms.
    Suzuki S; Yamamuro T; Okumura H; Yamamoto I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1001-6. PubMed ID: 1742578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A comparison of two noninvasive measurement methods for determining central osteoporosis taking into consideration the ash content].
    von Stremple A; Prokopp M; Flindt C
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8448227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral measurement: technical aspects, dosimetry, normal data and clinical applications.
    Karantanas AH; Kalef-Ezra JA; Glaros DC
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):298-304. PubMed ID: 2025767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The state of the art of non-invasive diagnostics for bone densitometry. Methods of photonic absorption.
    Baruffaldi F; Gnudi S; Toni A; Monducci A; Bernardi T
    Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(4):427-48. PubMed ID: 8706550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Osteodensitometry of vertebral metastases after radiotherapy using quantitative computed tomography.
    Reinbold WD; Wannenmacher M; Hodapp N; Adler CP
    Skeletal Radiol; 1989; 18(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 2588030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The quantitative determination of bone mineral content--a system comparison of similarly built computed tomographs].
    Andresen R; Radmer S; Banzer D; Felsenberg D; Wolf KJ
    Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 8136480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of spine and hip bone density by DXA and QCT in thalassemic patients.
    Danesi L; Cherubini R; Ciceri L; Graziadei G; Cappellini MD; Cavagnini F; Ortolani S
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 1998; 11 Suppl 3():961-2. PubMed ID: 10091172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of calibration materials in single- and dual-energy quantitative CT.
    Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):849-55. PubMed ID: 1584946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative computed tomography in pediatric patients.
    Gervais-André L; Vija L; Franchi-Abella S; Gonzales E; Linglart A; Adamsbaum C
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Apr; 97(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 26857788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fractional quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral density evaluation: accuracy, precision, and comparison to quantitative computed tomography.
    Lee J; Shin HI; Kim SY
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 15232393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton.
    Mazess RB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 21(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 2404237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study of bone mineral density estimated by various methods of single- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography: the capability of the four-equation four-unknown method.
    Tanno M; Horiuchi T; Ogihara M; Kishino T; Mashima Y; Endoh K; Karube S; Igarashi M; Yamada H
    Bone; 1996 Mar; 18(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 8703579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection of fat-equivalent materials in postprocessing dual-energy quantitative CT.
    Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL; van Panthaleon van Eck RB
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1051-6. PubMed ID: 1518467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between human rib mechanical properties and cortical bone density measured by high-resolution quantitative computed tomography.
    Zhu Y; Fang Y; Bermond F; Bruyère-Garnier K; Ellouz R; Rongieras F; Mitton D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16 Suppl 1():191-2. PubMed ID: 23923904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Microdensitometric method (MD method) of the second metacarpal bone].
    Hayashi Y
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Jan; 35(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Discuss about Key Issues of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Evaluation].
    Zheng C; Zhang Y; Sun Z; Jin Y
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 44(6):541-544. PubMed ID: 33314865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Kalender WA
    Osteoporos Int; 1992 Mar; 2(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 1536984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bone Mineral Density at the Ankle Measured with Quantitative CT (QCT).
    Zuo Y; Li Q; Cheng X
    J Clin Densitom; 2023; 26(2):101364. PubMed ID: 36967322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated definition and evaluation of anatomical ROI's for bone mineral determination by QCT.
    Klotz E; Kalender WA; Sandor T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1989; 8(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 18230537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Initial results with prereconstruction dual-energy computed tomography (PREDECT).
    Marshall WH; Alvarez RE; Macovski A
    Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):421-30. PubMed ID: 7255718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.