BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9648800)

  • 1. Radiologic placement of long-term subcutaneous venous access ports in children.
    Crowley JJ; Pereira JK; Harris LS; Becker CJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):257-60. PubMed ID: 9648800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
    Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
    Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
    Kluge A; Stroh H; Wagner D; Rauber K
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
    Funaki B; Szymski GX; Hackworth CA; Rosenblum JD; Burke R; Chang T; Leef JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of surgical and radiologic placed implantable central venous access ports.
    Sticca RP; Dewing BD; Harris JD
    Am J Surg; 2009 Dec; 198(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 19969137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of delayed complications of central venous catheters placed surgically or radiologically in pediatric oncology patients.
    Basford TJ; Poenaru D; Silva M
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 May; 38(5):788-92. PubMed ID: 12720195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
    Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term results of radiologic placement of a central vein access device.
    Beheshti MV; Protzer WR; Tomlinson TL; Martinek E; Baatz LA; Collins MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):731-4. PubMed ID: 9490964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost comparison of radiologic versus surgical placement of long-term hemodialysis catheters.
    Noh HM; Kaufman JA; Rhea JT; Kim SY; Geller SC; Waltman AC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):673-5. PubMed ID: 10063858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique.
    Charles HW; Miguel T; Kovacs S; Gohari A; Arampulikan J; McCann JW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19875065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series.
    Docktor BL; Sadler DJ; Gray RR; Saliken JC; So CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 10430153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
    Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E; Ragsdale J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Venous port salvage utilizing low dose tPA.
    Whigham CJ; Lindsey JI; Goodman CJ; Fisher RG
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2002; 25(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 12391517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
    Koonings PP; Given FT
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Central venous catheters with subcutaneous ports for long-term chemotherapy in pediatric oncology].
    Zmudzka-Stapińska I; Rawicz M; Sopyło B; Jaranowska D; Rokicka-Milewska R
    Acta Haematol Pol; 1992; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 1492541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interventional radiologic placement of chest wall ports: results and complications in 161 consecutive placements.
    Simpson KR; Hovsepian DM; Picus D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 9083981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-term central venous access in oncology. Review of a caseload of 750 cases].
    Bertoglio S; Meszsaros P; Disomma C; Moresco L; Cafiero F; Gipponi M; Percivale P
    Minerva Chir; 1996 Jun; 51(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 8992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].
    Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA
    Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.