These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9649110)

  • 1. Operational improvement of gynecologic laparoscopic operating room services: an internal review.
    Bachmann GA; Trattler B; Ko T; Tweddel G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 92(1):142-4. PubMed ID: 9649110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs associated with instrument sterilization in gynecologic surgery.
    Van Meter MM; Adam RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):652.e1-652.e5. PubMed ID: 27342044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Straface S
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data analysis of vascular surgery instrument trays yielded large cost and efficiency savings.
    Knowles M; Gay SS; Konchan SK; Mendes R; Rath S; Deshpande V; Farber MA; Wood BC
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(6):2144-2153. PubMed ID: 33359847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the magnitude and costs of intraoperative inefficiencies attributable to surgical instrument trays.
    Stockert EW; Langerman A
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Oct; 219(4):646-55. PubMed ID: 25154669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing.
    Dyas AR; Lovell KM; Balentine CJ; Wang TN; Porterfield JR; Chen H; Lindeman BM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 229():15-19. PubMed ID: 29936982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decreasing operating room costs via reduction of surgical instruments.
    Nast K; Swords KA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):153.e1-153.e6. PubMed ID: 30846251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
    Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a new reusable gynecologic laparoscopic electric morcellator with a disposable morcellator: a preliminary trial.
    Martínez-Zamora MA; Castelo-Branco C; Balasch J; Carmona F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):595-8. PubMed ID: 19596217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care.
    Guzman MJ; Gitelis ME; Linn JG; Ujiki MB; Waskerwitz M; Umanskiy K; Muldoon JP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 26445185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microsurgical instrument handling systems. A new approach to instrument budget control.
    Miller JK; Pepin SR
    Todays OR Nurse; 1993; 15(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 8342221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of unilateral nonpalpable testicles.
    Lorenzo AJ; Samuelson ML; Docimo SG; Baker LA; Lotan Y
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):712-6. PubMed ID: 15247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
    Lintula H; Kokki H; Vanamo K; Valtonen H; Mattila M; Eskelinen M
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jan; 158(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 14706955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Operating Room Costs With Head and Neck Surgical Instrumentation Optimization: A Surgeon-Led Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Yalamanchi P; Miller JE; Prout S; Matthews E; Spagnol C; Harrington S; Chang HF; Spector ME; Casper KA; Malloy KM
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 May; 148(5):402-407. PubMed ID: 35266982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Swem T; Fazzalari R
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.