These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9650184)

  • 1. Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Liu B; Guru SV; Morton AR; Keshavmurthy S; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):937-48. PubMed ID: 9650184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and evaluation of an external filter technique for exposure equalization in mammography.
    Keshavmurthy SP; Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Christodoulou E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1655-69. PubMed ID: 10501065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography.
    Feng SS; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031902. PubMed ID: 23464317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvements of an objective model of compressed breasts undergoing mammography: Generation and characterization of breast shapes.
    Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Feng SSJ; van Zelst J; Vreemann S; Mann JR; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2161-2172. PubMed ID: 28244109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mismatch in breast and detector size during screening and diagnostic mammography results in increased patient radiation dose.
    Wells CL; Slanetz PJ; Rosen MP
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 24331271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography.
    Sabol JM; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):887-98. PubMed ID: 8798174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 8289735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
    Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
    de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observer performance and dose efficiency of mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1517-25. PubMed ID: 8289736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.