These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9650188)

  • 41. Automatic segmentation of lung fields on chest radiographic images.
    Carreira MJ; Cabello D; Mosquera A
    Comput Biomed Res; 1999 Jun; 32(3):283-303. PubMed ID: 10356306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance analysis of a new computer aided detection system for identifying lung nodules on chest radiographs.
    Hardie RC; Rogers SK; Wilson T; Rogers A
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Jun; 12(3):240-58. PubMed ID: 18178123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Tsubamoto M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Saki H; Fujiwara K
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 12034953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of lung nodules in chest radiographs with an evaluation on a public database.
    Schilham AM; van Ginneken B; Loog M
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 16293441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A grey-level image alignment algorithm for registration of portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs.
    Hristov DH; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 8700035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11243351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lung segmentation in chest radiographs using anatomical atlases with nonrigid registration.
    Candemir S; Jaeger S; Palaniappan K; Musco JP; Singh RK; Zhiyun Xue ; Karargyris A; Antani S; Thoma G; McDonald CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Feb; 33(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 24239990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
    Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A level crossing enhancement scheme for chest radiograph images.
    Nagesha ; Kumar GH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1455-60. PubMed ID: 17374367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography.
    Cook LT; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Cox GG
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 7935205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Bochud FO; Verdun FR; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):102-8. PubMed ID: 15933089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How can a massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) be trained with a small number of cases in the distinction between nodules and vessels in thoracic CT?
    Suzuki K; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1333-41. PubMed ID: 16179210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection in digital chest radiographs using temporal subtraction images.
    Aoki T; Oda N; Yamashita Y; Yamamoto K; Korogi Y
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):1000-5. PubMed ID: 21718956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimally weighted wavelet transform based on supervised training for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Zhang W; Yoshida H; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):949-56. PubMed ID: 9650185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integration of Gibbs Markov random field and Hopfield-type neural networks for unsupervised change detection in remotely sensed multitemporal images.
    Ghosh A; Subudhi BN; Bruzzone L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Aug; 22(8):3087-96. PubMed ID: 23715521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.