These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9650194)

  • 21. [Evaluation of exposure dose for panoramic radiography].
    Hoshino Y; Fukushima Y; Sutou T; Fukuda J; Amanuma M; Otake H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Aug; 65(8):1048-54. PubMed ID: 19721313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Akbari F; Bayani Roodi S
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 23456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
    Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a MOSFET radiation sensor for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology.
    Peet DJ; Pryor MD
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):562-8. PubMed ID: 10560338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical use of carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters for skin dose determination.
    Ostwald PM; Kron T; Hamilton CS; Denham JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7591907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Low-dosage dental CT].
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Robertson J
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):142-7. PubMed ID: 16489195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
    Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for in vivo measurement of radiation exposure and related dose in mammography.
    Omran HA
    Radiol Technol; 1982; 53(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 6927768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Skin dose measurements using radiochromic films, TLDS and ionisation chamber and comparison with Monte Carlo simulation.
    Alashrah S; Kandaiya S; Maalej N; El-Taher A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 24300340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
    Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of in-phantom dose distributions for coronary angiography using an x-ray machine and synchrotron radiation.
    Nariyama N; Tanaka S; Nakane Y; Nakashima H; Hirayama H; Ban S; Namito Y; Hyodo K; Takeda T
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 11213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.
    Danforth RA; Clark DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 10673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose area product reference levels in dental panoramic radiology.
    Tierris CE; Yakoumakis EN; Bramis GN; Georgiou E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 15266083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. X-ray field size and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 24255139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures.
    Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Silverman SG; Hooton S; Tuncali K; Adams DF
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 10887246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.