These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9650437)
1. Hypnotic susceptibility order effects in waking analgesia. Brodeur JB; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 9650437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hypnotic analgesia, expectancy effects, and choice of design: a reexamination. Jacobs AL; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jan; 43(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 7875920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities. Crawford HJ; Allen SN Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focused analgesia and generalized relaxation produce differential hypnotic analgesia in response to ascending stimulus intensity. Sharav Y; Tal M Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Apr; 52(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15050376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: manual and response booklet. Bowers KS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):250-68. PubMed ID: 9650438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestion on pain in a cold pressor task. Maurer C; Santangelo M; Claiborn CD Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Oct; 41(4):305-16. PubMed ID: 8407019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of hypnotic analgesia and hypnotizability on experimental ischemic pain. DeBenedittis G; Panerai AA; Villamira MA Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jan; 37(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 2925294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focused analgesia in waking and hypnosis: effects on pain, memory, and somatosensory event-related potentials. De Pascalis V; Cacace I; Massicolle F Pain; 2008 Jan; 134(1-2):197-208. PubMed ID: 18023535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale. Kirsch I; Milling LS; Burgess C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 9650439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing. DePascalis V; Penna PM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 2347669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mexican norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Sánchez-Armáss O; Barabasz AF Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 16076668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention. Varga K; Németh Z; Szekely A Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1872-81. PubMed ID: 21963402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finding the hypnotic virtuoso--another look: a brief communication. Green JP; Lynn SJ; Carlson BW Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Apr; 40(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 1582726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]