These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9651015)

  • 1. Electrochemical study of insulating properties of dental amalgam bonding polymers.
    Toumelin-Chemla F; Degrange M
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1429-38. PubMed ID: 9651015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the long-term corrosion behavior of dental amalgams: influence of palladium addition and particle morphology.
    Colon P; Pradelle-Plasse N; Galland J
    Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 12628436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD; Vance RI
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ziskind D; Venezia E; Kreisman I; Mass E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12942059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive restorations with amalgam: guidelines for the clinician.
    Gwinnett AJ; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Oct; 25(10):687-95. PubMed ID: 9161246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in primary teeth restored by conventional or bonded amalgam technique.
    Myaki SI; Rodrigues CR; Raggio DP; Flores TA; Matson MR
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11696918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacing Amalgam Restorations: A Standardized Protocol Based on Analyzing Tissue Physicochemical Modifications.
    Decup F; Epaillard A; Chemla F
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Dec; 23(4):164-72. PubMed ID: 26767237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.