These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9651608)

  • 1. Cochlear implantation: past and present.
    Desloovere C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 9651608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. History of cochlear implantation.
    Ramsden RT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S3-5. PubMed ID: 24533753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Historical evolution of cochlear implants--from Volta to multichannel intracochlear stimulation].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Dec; 81(12):910-1; author reply 911. PubMed ID: 12557841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graham Fraser Memorial Lecture 2002. From frogs' legs to pieds-noirs and beyond: some aspects of cochlear implantation.
    Graham JM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Sep; 117(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 14561352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Turn on the Music: Cochlear Implants.
    Bear ZW; Mikulec AA
    Mo Med; 2016; 113(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 27039495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of cochlear implant technology and its clinical relevance.
    Hainarosie M; Zainea V; Hainarosie R
    J Med Life; 2014; 7 Spec No. 2(Spec Iss 2):1-4. PubMed ID: 25870662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The early history of the cochlear implant: a retrospective.
    Mudry A; Mills M
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 May; 139(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 23681026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The history of cochlear implantation].
    Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2016; 81(6):4-8. PubMed ID: 28091467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients.
    Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino FG
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 15744155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical survey of the French role in multichannel cochlear implant development.
    Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 135(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 25496058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implant channel separation and its influence on speech perception--implications for a new electrode design.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 17536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.