BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9651895)

  • 1. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of alternating-pressure air mattresses using a time-based pressure threshold technique and continuous measurements of transcutaneous gases.
    Rithalia SV; Heath GH; Gonsalkorale M
    J Tissue Viability; 2000 Jan; 10(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10839091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternating pressure air mattresses as prevention for pressure ulcers: a literature review.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 May; 45(5):784-801. PubMed ID: 17919638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of alternating pressure air mattresses: one laboratory-based strategy.
    Rithalia SV
    J Tissue Viability; 2004 Apr; 14(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15114927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.
    McLeod AG
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
    Tissue Viability Society
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternating-pressure air mattresses: the Quattro range.
    Lowthian P
    Br J Nurs; 1997 Jul 24-Aug 13; 6(14):827-33. PubMed ID: 9283309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quantitative assessment of pressure relief at the sacral area in adults lying supine on the operating room table].
    Masatsugu M; Akata T; Itonaga Y; Nakao F; Kansha M; Sato M; Takamatsu J
    Masui; 2005 Mar; 54(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 15794114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of patient support surfaces: principle, practice and limitations.
    Rithalia S
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 16012067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects.
    Chai CY; Bader DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():427-35. PubMed ID: 23791952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nimbus 3 alternating-pressure replacement mattress.
    Young T
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Apr 9-22; 7(7):409-12. PubMed ID: 9668757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological response of the heel tissue on pressure relief between three alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Goossens RH; Rithalia SV
    J Tissue Viability; 2008 Feb; 17(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18293766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
    Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.
    Counsell C; Seymour S; Guin P; Hudson A
    J Enterostomal Ther; 1990; 17(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 2380423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
    Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure signatures can influence tissue response for individuals supported on an alternating pressure mattress.
    Chai CY; Sadou O; Worsley PR; Bader DL
    J Tissue Viability; 2017 Aug; 26(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 28602246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of three types of alternating pressure air mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers in Belgian hospitals.
    Demarré L; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Grypdonck M; Clays E; Vanderwee K; Beeckman D
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 23907784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.