BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9652573)

  • 1. UK report calls for additional smear test re-reads.
    Bradbury J
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1227. PubMed ID: 9652573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cervical screening muddle.
    Sutton G
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New tests in cervical screening.
    Raffle AE
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9098):297. PubMed ID: 9457130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stat bite: Frequency of cervical cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(23):1741. PubMed ID: 15572755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cervical screening muddle.
    Herbert A
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129-30. PubMed ID: 9660603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional Pap smears are unreliable.
    Reid RI
    Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical smear policy.
    Lancet; 1985 Dec; 2(8467):1305. PubMed ID: 2866368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stat bite: Cancer screening for women.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):271. PubMed ID: 17312303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opportunities to improve cervical cancer screening in the United States.
    Kim JJ
    Milbank Q; 2012 Mar; 90(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 22428691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening. Testing times.
    Dignan K
    Nurs Times; 1993 Nov 3-9; 89(44):28-30. PubMed ID: 8233961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pro or contra Papanicolaou cytologic smear every 3 years].
    Delaloye JF; De Grandi P
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Jun; 128(23):909-13. PubMed ID: 9658520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and utilization of the Papanicolaou smear technique.
    Lee RE
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1979; 32(7):142-4, 153. PubMed ID: 392500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical smear tests. Automated mass-screening prospect.
    Nurs Times; 1968 Apr; 64(17):572-3. PubMed ID: 5643555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stigma over smear tests.
    Camm J
    Community Pract; 2005 Dec; 78(12):425. PubMed ID: 16375045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    McCartney P
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):246-7. PubMed ID: 7616815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Denton KJ
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Campbell D
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7677888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling the implications for hospital services of cervical cytology screening: a case history.
    Boyd A; Davies LA; Bagust A
    J Oper Res Soc; 1989 Jun; 40(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 10293891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the right cancer screening rate?
    Harris R
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(9):732-4. PubMed ID: 10787367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting cervical screening uptake in prisoners.
    Plugge E; Fitzpatrick R
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 15006115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.