These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9652573)
21. [The coverage of cervical screening in Hungary]. Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Kovács A; Budai A; Székely T Orv Hetil; 2007 Nov; 148(46):2177-82. PubMed ID: 17988975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida. Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Too much of a good thing? Sirovich BE Milbank Q; 2012 Mar; 90(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22428692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Screening for cervix uteri cancer]. Borràs JM; Iglesias X Med Clin (Barc); 1994; 102 Suppl 1():80-4. PubMed ID: 8170254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening--an alternative viewpoint. Rogers A West Engl Med J; 1990 Sep; 105(3):77-9, 71. PubMed ID: 2093353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Television soap opera and the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: follow-up data. Owen-Smith V; Howe A; Richardson J J Public Health Med; 2003 Jun; 25(2):183. PubMed ID: 12848413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Papanicolaou smear screening of women with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Taiwan. Lin LP; Lin JD; Sung CL; Liu TW; Liu YL; Chen LM; Chu CM Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 19897337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PAPNET superior to rapid rescreening. Wright RG Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):253-4. PubMed ID: 9539909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Women have a right to the most accurate result. Roberts JM; Bowditch R; Gurley AM; Laverty CR; Thurloe JK Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252-3. PubMed ID: 9539908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New Pap test guidelines recommend less frequent screening for most women. Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2010 May; 14(5):3. PubMed ID: 20372097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions. Wilkinson C Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Aug; 42(361):336-9. PubMed ID: 1457156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Limitations within the cervical cytology screening service. Carr P Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1987 Jun; 23(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 3650662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bayesian analysis of binary data from an audit of cervical smears. Raab GM; Elton RA Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(23):2179-89. PubMed ID: 8310188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low Pap smear rates leave women at risk. Golden WE; Hickman N J Ark Med Soc; 2004 Jun; 100(12):426-7. PubMed ID: 15200282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Bethesda system for classification of Pap smears: the clinical experience of one cancer screening center. Mahon SM Cancer Nurs; 1995 Dec; 18(6):458-66. PubMed ID: 8564942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical screening in general practice. BMJ; 1990 Jul; 301(6745):236-8. PubMed ID: 2393733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]