386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9652923)
1. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
Chantler C; Chantler S
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
Farthing MJ
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Conduct unbecoming--the MRC's approach.
Evans I
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1728-9. PubMed ID: 9652921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
Goldbeck-Wood S
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with deception.
Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
Wells F
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
Williams N
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
Maisonneuve H
BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research misconduct -- have we reached the turning point at last?
Jay P
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Jan; 5(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 11658010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. British editors form misconduct panel.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
