206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9653408)
1. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers.
Litzelman DK; Stratos GA; Marriott DJ; Skeff KM
Acad Med; 1998 Jun; 73(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 9653408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and psychometric characteristics of a new domain of the stanford faculty development program instrument.
Owolabi MO
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2014; 34(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 24648360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot study of faculty development for basic science teachers.
Skeff KM; Stratos GA; Bergen MR; Regula DP
Acad Med; 1998 Jun; 73(6):701-4. PubMed ID: 9653410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine].
Martínez-González A; Lifshitz-Guinzberg A; González-Quintanilla E; Monterrosas-Rojas AM; Flores-Hernández F; Gatica-Lara F; Martínez-Franco AI; Sánchez-Mendiola M
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 29190872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the 25-Item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on Clinical Teaching Effectiveness.
Mintz M; Southern DA; Ghali WA; Ma IW
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 25893939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.
Al Ansari A; Strachan K; Hashim S; Otoom S
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28302151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation in undergraduate medical education: Conceptualizing and validating a novel questionnaire for assessing the quality of bedside teaching.
Dreiling K; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Müller T; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T
Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28532203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving clinical teaching. Evaluation of a national dissemination program.
Skeff KM; Stratos GA; Berman J; Bergen MR
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jun; 152(6):1156-61. PubMed ID: 1599342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the SETOC instrument -- Student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics.
Zuberi RW; Bordage G; Norman GR
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 Feb; 12(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 17160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving clinical teaching in China: initial report of a multihospital pilot faculty development effort.
Wong JG; Fang Y
Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 23036004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers].
Lombarts MJ; Arah OA; Busch OR; Heineman MJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A1222. PubMed ID: 20170574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.
Baral N; Paudel BH; Das BK; Aryal M; Das BP; Jha N; Lamsal M
Nepal Med Coll J; 2007 Sep; 9(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 18092430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of large-group lectures in medicine - development of the SETMED-L (Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures) questionnaire.
Müller T; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Dreiling K; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; Raupach T; von Steinbüchel N
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28821257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.
Postuma R
Can J Surg; 1985 Jul; 28(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 4016610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching.
Beckman TJ; Lee MC; Rohren CH; Pankratz VS
Med Teach; 2003 Mar; 25(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 12745519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical teaching improvement: The transportability of the Stanford Faculty Development Program.
Johansson J; Skeff K; Stratos G
Med Teach; 2009 Aug; 31(8):e377-82. PubMed ID: 19811202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of an instrument (the COLT) to measure conceptions on learning and teaching of teachers, in student-centred medical education.
Jacobs JC; Van Luijk SJ; Van Berkel H; Van der Vleuten CP; Croiset G; Scheele F
Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):e483-91. PubMed ID: 22746966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers.
Stalmeijer RE; Dolmans DH; Wolfhagen IH; Peters WG; van Coppenolle L; Scherpbier AJ
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 19779976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A good clinician and a caring person: longitudinal faculty development and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care.
Branch WT; Frankel R; Gracey CF; Haidet PM; Weissmann PF; Cantey P; Mitchell GA; Inui TS
Acad Med; 2009 Jan; 84(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 19116489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers.
Stalmeijer RE; Dolmans DH; Wolfhagen IH; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ
Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1732-8. PubMed ID: 20881822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
