These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9655047)

  • 21. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Oct; 23(10):911-6, 918, 920 passim; quiz 924. PubMed ID: 12434616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ceramic inlays and onlays: update 1995.
    Nasedkin JN
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Aug; 61(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 7553399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of repairing old amalgam restorations with composite inlays.
    Alhadainy HA; Abdel-Aziz AH; Abdel-Kereim UM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 9823076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ceromer/FRC technology: the future of biofunctional adhesive aesthetic dentistry.
    Fahl N; Casellini RC
    Signature; 1997; 4(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 9543864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remakes of Colorlogic and IPS Empress ceramic restorations in general practice.
    Hekland H; Riise T; Berg E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 14714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Indirect resin inlay and onlay restorations: a comprehensive clinical overview.
    Jackson RD
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 11(8):891-900; quiz 902. PubMed ID: 10853596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cast partial restorations: outdated!].
    Creugers NH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Nov; 111(11):442-4. PubMed ID: 15626132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anatomical applications of a new direct Ceromer.
    Dietschi D
    Signature; 1997; 4(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 9543854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dental materials for posterior restorations.
    Rykke M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Aug; 8(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 1291301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fiber-reinforced framework and Ceromer restorations: a technical review.
    Zanghellini G
    Signature; 1997; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9543852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
    Lowe E; Rego NA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays.
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.