BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9656489)

  • 1. Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation.
    Civetta A; Singh RS
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Jul; 15(7):901-9. PubMed ID: 9656489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of seminal fluid gene expression and postmating reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    Flacchi C; Capri N; Civetta A
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 38416119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A genomic comparison of faster-sex, faster-X, and faster-male evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Musters H; Huntley MA; Singh RS
    J Mol Evol; 2006 Jun; 62(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 16612543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation.
    Wu CI; Hollocher H; Begun DJ; Aquadro CF; Xu Y; Wu ML
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1995 Mar; 92(7):2519-23. PubMed ID: 7708677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid evolution and gene-specific patterns of selection for three genes of spermatogenesis in Drosophila.
    Civetta A; Rajakumar SA; Brouwers B; Bacik JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 16357040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. fog-2 and the evolution of self-fertile hermaphroditism in Caenorhabditis.
    Nayak S; Goree J; Schedl T
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Jan; 3(1):e6. PubMed ID: 15630478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.
    Zeng LW; Comeron JM; Chen B; Kreitman M
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82. PubMed ID: 9720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila.
    Aguadé M
    Genetics; 1999 Jun; 152(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 10353898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.
    Anholt RRH; O'Grady P; Wolfner MF; Harbison ST
    Genetics; 2020 Jan; 214(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 31907301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila.
    Zhang Z; Hambuch TM; Parsch J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2130-9. PubMed ID: 15282334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The nature of genetic variation in sex and reproduction-related genes among sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15088662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered Sonoran topminnow.
    Hurt CR; Farzin M; Hedrick PW
    Genetics; 2005 Oct; 171(2):655-62. PubMed ID: 15972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
    Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular evolution of candidate genes involved in post-mating-prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Hoang K; Brandsmeier L
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 25522894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations.
    Kwan L; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):710-23. PubMed ID: 19817849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.