These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9656871)

  • 1. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries.
    Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
    Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
    Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects.
    Nair MK; Bezik J
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of tuned aperture computed tomography in the diagnosis of radicular fractures in non-restored maxillary anterior teeth--an in vitro study.
    Nair MK; Nair UP; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Sep; 31(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 12203128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
    Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
    Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography for the detection of mandibular fractures.
    Nair MK; Webber RL; Johnson MP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10980566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.