These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond. Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents. Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners. Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations. Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations. Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access. Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol. Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations. Eberting JJ Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an adhesive system for amalgam repair: bond strength and porosity. Nuckles DB; Draughn RA; Smith TI Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):829-33. PubMed ID: 7568691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth. Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]