441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9656923)
1. Using double-poured alginate impressions to fabricate bleaching trays.
Haywood VB; Powe A
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 9656923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
Ishida K
Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of second pour casts using dual-arch impressions.
Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 1290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Analysis of the Dimensional Change Of an Irreversible Hydrocolloid Impression Material (Alginate) with Varying Storage Times.
Ibrahem F; Giugliano T; Ruff RR; Choi M
Prim Dent J; 2022 Dec; 11(4):86-91. PubMed ID: 36533371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of impression technique and multiple pours on accuracy of stone models.
Tuit CM; Rosen M; Cohen J; Becker PJ
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Oct; 46(10):515-8. PubMed ID: 1820670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
