These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9656923)

  • 21. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Angle reproducibility and surface roughness of stone casts obtained from combined agar-alginate impressions].
    Ohta T
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 May; 9(3):401-11. PubMed ID: 2135530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wax Lining in an Impression Tray and Accuracy in Gypsum Cast Fabrication.
    Hansen P; Franco R; Beatty M
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jan; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy.
    Davis RD; Schwartz RS
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials.
    Imbery TA; Nehring J; Janus C; Moon PC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 20045819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of storage time of extended-pour and conventional alginate impressions on dimensional accuracy of casts.
    Rohanian A; Ommati Shabestari G; Zeighami S; Samadi MJ; Shamshiri AR
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Nov; 11(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 25628695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
    Ishida K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of the second pour casts using dual-arch trays.
    Broilo JR; Ghiggi PC; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
    Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21558786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of undercut depths on the accuracy of casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Mudliar VL; Li KC; van Vuuren LJ; Waddell JN
    Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03143. PubMed ID: 31970297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
    Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.