116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9657546)
1. Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength?
Barber JW; Boden SD; Ganey T; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Jun; 11(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 9657546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs.
McLain RF; Fry MF; Moseley TA; Sharkey NA
J Spinal Disord; 1995 Feb; 8(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 7711371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation.
Dick JC; Jones MP; Zdeblick TA; Kunz DN; Horton WC
J Spinal Disord; 1994 Oct; 7(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 7819640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
Linhardt O; Lüring C; Matussek J; Hamberger C; Plitz W; Grifka J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 16760780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.
Su BW; Kim PD; Cha TD; Lee J; April EW; Weidenbaum M; Vaccaro AR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1355-62. PubMed ID: 19478655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L; Link T; Halm H
Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Apr; 67(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11383294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.
Dath R; Sirkett DM; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 18525483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress relaxation at the bone-pedicle screw interface in human bone.
Inceoğlu S; Akbay A; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1321-6. PubMed ID: 16721293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies.
Inceoğlu S; Montgomery WH; St Clair S; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 21388287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
