BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9659134)

  • 1. An economic evaluation of the use of rare earth screens to reduce the radiation dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures in Israel.
    Ginsberg GM; Schlesinger T; Ben-Shlomo A; Kushilevsky A; Margaliot M; Oren M; Finkleman M; Friedman A; Handlesman M; Lev B
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):406-12. PubMed ID: 9659134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
    Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rare earth screens: prevention of radiogenic cancers versus local budgets.
    Matthews IP; Roberts CJ; Rogers K
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Jul; 39(4):464. PubMed ID: 3180665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple methods to reduce patient exposure during scoliosis radiography.
    Butler PF; Thomas AW; Thompson WE; Wollerton MA; Rachlin JA
    Radiol Technol; 1986; 57(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 3715012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
    Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
    Hofmann T
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dose reduction during radiological examination using high intensity rare earth screens or increased kV (author's transl)].
    Freyschmidt J; Saure D; Ujak W; Nüsslin F
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 149722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new rare-earth screen for skeletal radiography.
    De Smet AA; Ritter EM; Fritz SL; Martin NL; Chang CH; Templeton AW
    Radiology; 1981 Nov; 141(2):542-3. PubMed ID: 7291587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
    Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
    Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
    Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reduction of patient dose with maximum assurance of image quality].
    Kuhn H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Jul; 38(7):224-30. PubMed ID: 4035266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
    Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter.
    Wesenberg RL; Amundson GM; Mueller DL; Coupland SG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Sep; 38(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 2958463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure reduction and image quality for pantomographic radiography.
    Tyndall DA; Bedsole SM
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3659339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.