These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9659243)
21. Pediatric blood culture evaluation of the BACTEC PEDS Plus and the DuPont Isolator 1.5 systems. Eisenach K; Dyke J; Boehme M; Johnson B; Cook MB Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1582166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles with standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood. Lelièvre H; Gimenez M; Vandenesch F; Reinhardt A; Lenhardt D; Just HM; Pau M; Ausina V; Etienne J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 16(9):669-74. PubMed ID: 9352260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicenter comparison of BACTEC 9050 and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems. Murray PR; Hollick GE; Jerris RC; Wilson ML J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1601-3. PubMed ID: 9620384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of 2 systems of blood culture: Signal and Bactec]. Croizé J; Cadoux B; Leclerc P; François P; Brion JP; Le Noc P Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989; 47(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2675682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the need for anaerobic medium for the recovery of clinically significant blood culture isolates in children. Dunne WM; Tillman J; Havens PL Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1994 Mar; 13(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 8177628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus/F bottle compared with conventional methods for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. Hughes JG; Vetter EA; Patel R; Schleck CD; Harmsen S; Turgeant LT; Cockerill FR J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4468-71. PubMed ID: 11724863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the BACTEC system with blind subculture for the detection of bacteremia. Caslow M; Ellner PD; Kiehn TE Appl Microbiol; 1974 Sep; 28(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 4607595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results. Qian Q; Tang YW; Kolbert CP; Torgerson CA; Hughes JG; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Montgomery SO; Cockerill FR; Persing DH J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3578-82. PubMed ID: 11574575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative study of three different BACTEC culture media for the detection of bacteremia in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Church DL; Davies HD; Cadrain G; Trevenen CL Can J Infect Dis; 1998 Mar; 9(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 22451773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the relevance of use of the BD-BACTEC®MycosisIC/F, BD-BACTEC®PlusAerobic/F, BD-BACTEC®Lytic/10 anaerobic/F and BD-BACTEC®PedsPlus/F culture bottle system for fungemia detection: A 4-year retrospective study at the Dijon university hospital, France. Magallon A; Basmaciyan L; Chapuis A; Valot S; Sautour M; Bador J; Dalle F J Mycol Med; 2022 Nov; 32(4):101295. PubMed ID: 35598569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients. Roh KH; Kim JY; Kim HN; Lee HJ; Sohn JW; Kim MJ; Cho Y; Kim YK; Lee CK Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jul; 73(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 22541787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical comparison of Sentinel, a novel blood culture system, with radiometric Bactec 460 and Isolator 10 in the detection of streptococcal and anaerobic bacteraemias. Hutchinson NA; Shanson DC; Malins T J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1624593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of four methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from BACTEC 9240 blood culture system. Ozen NS; Ogunc D; Mutlu D; Ongut G; Baysan BO; Gunseren F Indian J Med Microbiol; 2011; 29(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21304194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Microorganism Detection and Time to Positivity in Pediatric and Standard Media from Three Major Commercial Continuously Monitored Blood Culture Systems. Yarbrough ML; Wallace MA; Burnham CD J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 59(7):e0042921. PubMed ID: 33910963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Diagnostic reliability of anaerobic blood cultures in bacteremias from a critical care unit]. Ruiz-Giardín JM; Alonso M; Jaquetti J; Sánchez S; Saldaña T; Zapatero A Med Clin (Barc); 2009 May; 132(19):729-34. PubMed ID: 19368938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system. Strand CL Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Dec; 78(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6756125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of BACTEC and BacT/ALERT systems in evaluation of blood cultures]. Ardiç N; Ilga U; Ozyurt M; Haznedaroğlu T Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004 Oct; 38(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 15700666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of a blood culture inoculation technique on detection of bacteremia by the BACTEC system. Carlson LG; Plorde JJ J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Sep; 16(3):590-2. PubMed ID: 6752196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system. Thomson RB; File TM; Tan JS; Evans BL J Clin Microbiol; 1987 May; 25(5):819-23. PubMed ID: 3294885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]