BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9660603)

  • 41. Cervical screening and the new contract.
    BMJ; 1991 Sep; 303(6804):717-8. PubMed ID: 1912929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1977 Jul; 2(6079):122-3. PubMed ID: 406005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives.
    Wong JG; Feussner JR
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):342-5. PubMed ID: 8350931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Towards effective cervical screening.
    Havelock C; Havelock P
    Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cervical cytology screening.
    Sherwood A
    BMJ; 1988 Sep; 297(6648):625. PubMed ID: 3139256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stigma over smear tests.
    Camm J
    Community Pract; 2005 Dec; 78(12):425. PubMed ID: 16375045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and utilization of the Papanicolaou smear technique.
    Lee RE
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1979; 32(7):142-4, 153. PubMed ID: 392500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Koss LG
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The cervical smear test.
    Havelock CM
    Practitioner; 1987 Jan; 231(1423):74-80. PubMed ID: 3313373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Screening for the 21st century: learning from the past.
    Raffle AE
    Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10714370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Management of cervical dyskaryosis.
    Soutter WP
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6956):744. PubMed ID: 7950547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An epidemic averted through medical screening.
    Austin H
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15814012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How not to organise a cervical screening programme.
    Skegg DC
    N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cervical screening and government policy.
    Tankel JW
    BMJ; 1989 Aug; 299(6696):458. PubMed ID: 2507017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Screening for cervical cancer by Pap smear.
    Rehan N
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 39(4):116-8. PubMed ID: 2501528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Failure of the cervical cytology screening programme.
    Robin ED
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6461):75-7. PubMed ID: 3917346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cervical screening: a do it yourself job for general practice.
    Gutteridge W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6518):451-2. PubMed ID: 3081123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conventional Pap smears are unreliable.
    Reid RI
    Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cervical screening program for Sri Lanka--can we afford it?
    Sirisena J
    Ceylon Med J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10643099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.