108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9660604)
1. The cervical screening muddle.
Slater D
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1130. PubMed ID: 9660604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The screening muddle.
Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):459. PubMed ID: 9482430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical screening.
Lancet; 1989 Sep; 2(8663):627-9. PubMed ID: 2570326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical screening: making it better.
Quek SC; Singer A
Practitioner; 1999 Jun; 243(1599):441. PubMed ID: 10476562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The cervical screening muddle.
Thornton H
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1130-1. PubMed ID: 9660605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The cervical screening muddle.
Sutton G
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The cervical screening muddle.
Herbert A
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129-30. PubMed ID: 9660603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The cervical screening muddle.
Womack C; Warren AY
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
Sedlis A
Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer control--Rhode Island.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1989 Sep; 38(38):659-62. PubMed ID: 2506415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix.
Anderson GH
CMAJ; 1992 Apr; 146(8):1280; author reply 1280, 1284-5. PubMed ID: 1555154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
Chamberlain J
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Wain GV; Hacker NF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control in Papanicolaou tests.
Wachtel M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):804; author reply 805. PubMed ID: 12428803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou cervical smears for screening in asymptomatic women.
Barnes BA
Prim Care; 1981 Mar; 8(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 6911755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
