BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9660635)

  • 1. Rapid review.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
    Slater DN
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
    Shield PW; Cox NC
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid rescreening.
    Rubin A
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 9577744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
    Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal quality assurance of sensitivity of primary screening.
    Boxer ME
    Cytopathology; 1998 Oct; 9(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 9800134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid pre-screening: a validated quality assurance measure in cervical cytology.
    Smith J; Nicholas D; Boyd K; Deacon-Smith R
    Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 14510892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invited commentary--Rapid review: current practice.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 11488873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid screening: a comparative study.
    Dudding N; Hewer EM; Lancucki L; Rice S
    Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 11488872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?
    Farrell DJ; Bilkhu S; Gibson LM; Cummings L; Wadehra V
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9100751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
    Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
    Linder J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cytology EQA--the Northern experience.
    Llewellyn H
    Cytopathology; 2001 Aug; 12(4):272-3. PubMed ID: 11512548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control in Papanicolaou tests.
    Wachtel M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):804; author reply 805. PubMed ID: 12428803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
    Calvache AE
    Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.