These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9660704)
1. Editors call for misconduct watchdog. Williams N Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. Farthing MJ Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. British editors form misconduct panel. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Call for research misconduct agency. White C BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Will the UK cope? Horton R Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters. Farthing MJ BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. Smith R BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7313):588. PubMed ID: 11557693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. Chantler C; Chantler S BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct. Marcovitch H Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):207. PubMed ID: 19329006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud. Williams N Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors. Yankauer A Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles". Miller DR Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. UK watchdog issues guidelines to combat medical research fraud. Jones J BMJ; 1999 Sep; 319(7211):660. PubMed ID: 10480813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misconduct in research: editors respond. Smith R BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):201-2. PubMed ID: 9253258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research. Caelleigh AS Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S23-9. PubMed ID: 8373488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process. Rennie D JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 8320791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to face up to research misconduct. Smith R BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public. Smith R BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]